[Bug fortran/93484] [8/9/10 Regression] ICE in gfc_typenode_for_spec, at fortran/trans-types.c:1120 since r7-4028-g87c9fca50cbe7ca9

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93484

--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Mark Eggleston
<markeggles...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c38daa7976886a59a3cd496b5c776d75f3cdb056

commit r10-7369-gc38daa7976886a59a3cd496b5c776d75f3cdb056
Author: Mark Eggleston <markeggles...@gcc.gnu.org>
Date:   Wed Mar 25 08:33:03 2020 +0000

    fortran: ICE using undeclared symbol in array constructor PR93484

    Using undeclared symbol k in an expression in the following
    array constructor results in an ICE:

        print *, [real(x(k))]

    If the call to the intrinsic is not in a constructor a no IMPLICIT
    type error is reported and the ICE does not occur.

    Matching on an expression instead of an initialisation express an
    and not converting a MATCH_ERROR return value into MATCH_NO results
    in the no IMPLICIT error and no ICE.

    Note: Steven G. Kargl  <ka...@gcc.gnu.org> is the author of the
    changes except for the test cases.

    gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

            PR fortran/93484
            * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): Replace gfc_match_init_expr with
            gfc_match_expr. Return m if m is MATCH_NO or MATCH_ERROR.

    gcc/testsuite

            PR fortran/93484
            * gfortran.dg/pr93484_1.f90: New test.
            * gfortran.dg/pr93484_2.f90: New test.