https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94445
--- Comment #5 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yeah... So far I have checked that 'gimplify_call_expr' creates the right gimple, and up until 'gimplify_modify_expr' I can verify it does by using gimple_call_fntype . Though at expansion time, the 'gimple_call_fntype (stmt)' of '_5 = s_bar_p_2(D) (); [tail call]' now has the attribute ... So it must go wrong somewhere between gimplification and expansion, but that's a big window and dump files won't help us :(
