https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94852
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
CC| |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Last reconfirmed| |2020-04-30
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org>
---
Reopening. I don't think this is a dup of PR323. The problem
is instead that the workaround for PR323 is silently accepted
and applied even on targets for which the workaround isn't needed.
That seems like a valid point to me, and if we don't have an
earlier PR making the same point, I think we should keep this
one open.
I agree that at the very least the documentation could be improved
(but I'm not volunteering :-))
