[Bug c++/94932] [10/11 Regression] ICE in ovl_skip_hidden, at cp/tree.c:2292 since r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61

[marxin at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94932

Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2020-05-04
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
            Summary|ICE in ovl_skip_hidden, at  |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
                   |cp/tree.c:2292              |ovl_skip_hidden, at
                   |                            |cp/tree.c:2292 since
                   |                            |r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61
                 CC|                            |jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
      Known to fail|                            |10.0, 11.0
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r10-8016-gbce54ed494fd0e61, before that it was rejected:
pr94932.cc:15:24: error: declaration of ‘std::strong_ordering
Synth::operator<=>(Synth::B, Synth::B) noexcept’ has a different exception
specifier
   15 |   std::strong_ordering operator<=>(B, B) noexcept;
      |                        ^~~~~~~~
pr94932.cc:13:33: note: from previous declaration ‘std::strong_ordering
Synth::operator<=>(Synth::B, Synth::B)’
   13 |     friend std::strong_ordering operator<=>(B, B) = default;
      |                                 ^~~~~~~~