https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95081
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Parameter names are not copyrightable. If you want to define a class with the
same API as std::vector then of course you're going to use the same names for
the member functions.
The only thing copyrightable in there are the comments. I suggest you bring
this up with the ROS2 project, or the Free Software Foundation. There's no GCC
bug here.
See https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.en.html
