https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks| |16994, 54367 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3) > > It is fixed for gcc 10, probably by > > g:00a49cd840f60774b0e9e0109fb10559bc9a9194. > > Yes, it's fixed with this commit. So... is there a reason to leave this bug open then? Backports? Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 [Bug 16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++ https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367 [Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions