https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95521
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm <dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to bouanto from comment #0)
> The reproducer is very big, so tell me if you want me to try to make it
> smaller.
Yes please!
The attachment reproduces the ICE for me, but is too big for me to work with.
By adding this:
gcc_jit_context_dump_to_file (ctxt_0x7feee9512e00, "/tmp/something.c",
1 /* update_locations */);
to immediately after the create call code, it generates "source" locations in
the generated /tmp/something.c. By poking in the debugger at the location
info:
(gdb) p loc->m_recording_loc->m_line
$10 = 6773
it shows that the issue is triggered at line 6773, which is here in the dump:
repeat_loop_body:
*((unsigned char *)loop_var) = returnValue;
intLocal = (unsigned long long)1;
loop_var += *((unsigned char * *)&intLocal); <<<<< HERE
goto repeat_loop_header;
within extern bool
_ZN4core3fmt3num12GenericRadix7fmt_int17h0643c6b8b66acb3dE (struct
fmt::num::Binary * param, unsigned int param, struct fmt::Formatter * param)
Is it possible for you to use the above info to make a small(er) reproducer?
Thanks.
