https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91432
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers at google dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ndesaulniers at google dot com
--- Comment #3 from Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers at google dot com> ---
Isn't this still an implicit fallthrough, though? It may not "be a bug," but
that's why warnings are not errors; they may not result in "bugs."
The issue is that Clang will warn in this case, so developers get confused
about writing compiler-portable code with intentional fallthrough vs being
warned about unintentional fallthrough.
Why shouldn't developers annotate that the implicit fallthrough from `case 1`
to `default` was intentional, making it explicit?
