https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95724
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > > Note the testcase does not ICE so ice-on-invalid is wrong. It's really > > a diagnostic only. If we want sth extra to distinguish error diagnostics > > from warning diagnostics then we should add one (can't come up with a good > > name right now) > > It's like a weaker form of error-recovery but for cases that don't ICE. error-recovery is fine then I guess since it doens't imply ICEing. We use the combo of ice-on-invalid-code, error-recovery for that. But indeed the description says 'use only for ice-on-invalid-code' ... > cascading-errors maybe.