https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80794
--- Comment #10 from Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs at stdin dot nl> --- Also note that pr96996, that was marked as a duplicate of this report, talks about a notable subcase of the case presented in this report. While this report talks about constant complete objects (e.g. a variable marked const), pr96996 talks about const subobjects (e.g. a const member of a variable that might not be const itself). That pr has some motivation to argue that such const subobjects can be optimized in the same way as const complete objects. Maybe this is obvious for seasoned gcc devs, but I wanted to point it out regardless, since the cases seem distinct enough to me that one might end up fixing this for objects and forgetting about subobjects :-)
