https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97320
Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Severity|normal |enhancement
Depends on| |90302
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
It's not an exact duplicate of PR 94978; that bug is about
a false positive without -Wdo-subscript, whereas this one is
about a false positive with -Wdo-subscript.
The reason why this is rather difficult to resolve is one
of translation phases.
In the gfortran front end, we create a syntax tree from the
Fortran source code. On the basis of that syntax tree (where
we still know a lot about the langauge) we issue that warning.
The next step is conversion to an intermediate language, which
gets handed to the main part of gcc for further processing
(known as the "middle end").
It is the middle which is does most of the optimizations, and
which has the tools to do so. In this particular instance, we
would need "range propagation" (where the compiler can infer the
range of variables from previous statements). We don't do that
in the front end, because a) it would be a major piece of work, and
b) it would duplicate a lot of what the middle end already does.
The most elegant solution would be support from the middle and
back end to put in a pseudo statement, like a __bulitin_warning
"function".
Code like
integer :: a(12)
do i=1,10
a(i-1) = 1
could then be annotated like
do i=1,10
if (0 < lbound(a)) call __builtin_warning ("index out of bounds")
if (9 > ubound(a)) call __builtin_warning ("index out of bounds")
a(i-1) = 1
and if the compiler could not prove that these statements get removed
by dead code elimination, it would issue the warning in the final phase of
translation.
This would pretty much eliminate false positives, and would be
far superior than what we currently do.
Unfortunately, this is a part of a compiler with which I am almost
totally unfamiliar, so I cannot help there. Some preliminary work
has been done (see PR 90302), but I don't know how far it has
progressed in the meantime.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90302
[Bug 90302] Implement __builtin_warning
