https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97699
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #0) > BTW, there's a typo in the error message, it should say > fzero-call-used-regs rather than fzero-call-used_regs (that is '-' instead > of '_' before 'regs') That one I fixed as obvious in r11-4721-g243492e2c69741b91dbfe3bba9b772f65fc9354c Otherwise, Richard S wrote regarding the FAIL + sorry: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-November/558041.html > these are a signal to target maintainers that they need > to decide whether to add support or accept the status quo > (in which case a new effective-target will be needed). See: > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557595.html: > > The new tests are likely to fail on some targets with the sorry() > message, but I think target maintainers are best placed to decide > whether (a) that's a fundamental restriction of the target and the > tests should just be skipped or (b) the target needs to implement > the new hook.