https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98281

--- Comment #2 from ishikawa,chiaki <ishikawa at yk dot rim.or.jp> ---
Created attachment 49764
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49764&action=edit
The patch that I had for 94021

Funny I thought this was gone for a while with gcc-9 and an earlier 10 (?)

I say this because I had a patch as attached locally (which I produced since I
reported bug 94021).
But I could compile the source without the patch this Fall., it seems. Yeah, I
took it out from my local patch queeu.

Maybe something changed.

Also, please notice that the first part of the patch is for the case quite
similar to bug 94021 comment 4 test example, and I think that was somehow taken
care of (?)

Anyway, the bug(s) still persist for the static snprintf format check.

Reply via email to