https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98338
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Doesn't that just enable the possibility of ICF optimization of those:
> bool
> operator_plus::op1_range (irange &r, tree type,
> const irange &lhs,
> const irange &op2) const
> {
> return range_op_handler (MINUS_EXPR, type)->fold_range (r, type, lhs, op2);
> }
>
> bool
> operator_plus::op2_range (irange &r, tree type,
> const irange &lhs,
> const irange &op1) const
> {
> return range_op_handler (MINUS_EXPR, type)->fold_range (r, type, lhs, op1);
> }
> methods?
Yes. The problem is related to the speculative indirect call.
