https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98513
Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška <marxin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
A cleaner test-case:
$ cat combined.cc
extern unsigned long long var_20;
extern unsigned short arr_8[][26][1][1][11];
const int &max(int &a, const int &b) { return a > b ? a : b; }
int test___trans_tmp_1, var_5 = -1, var_6 = -2;
void test(int var_5, int var_6,
signed char arr_1[1][1][1]) {
for (unsigned i_0 = 0; i_0 < 21; i_0 += 2)
for (int i_2 = 0; i_2 < 8; i_2 += 82) {
for (int i_3 = 0; i_3 < test___trans_tmp_1; i_3++)
for (short i_4 = 0; i_4 < 20; i_4 += 4)
var_20 = max(var_5, 0);
for (int i_5 = 0; i_5 < 19;
i_5 += 20)
for (int i_6 = var_6 + 2; i_6 < var_5 + 3; i_6++)
arr_8[3][2][i_2][i_5][i_6] = arr_1[0][0][0];
}
}
unsigned long long var_20;
signed char arr_1[1][1][1];
unsigned short arr_8[22][26][1][1][11];
int main() { test(var_5, var_6, arr_1); }
Optimized dump contains:
<bb 11> [local count: 17523394]:
_93 = MEM[(signed char[26][19] *)arr_1_31(D) + 1482B][2][0];
_94 = (short unsigned int) _93;
arr_8[3][2][0][0][-2147483648] = _94; <---- HERE
if (i_6_103 > _131)
goto <bb 9>; [11.00%]
else
goto <bb 12>; [89.00%]
which is instruction that causes the segfault. I'm going to take a look.
