https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96386
--- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> --- Hi Thomas, When did it get fixed? I seem to have done so many associate fixes that I barely know where to start - was it even me? Lots of the recent PRs are low lying fruit. It's pleasing to see patches of a few lines doing the job :-) Are you on to teams now? Cheers Paul On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 19:36, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96386 > > Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Resolution|--- |FIXED > CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot > gnu.org > Status|NEW |RESOLVED > > --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > The code has been fixed in the meantime. I have committed the > test case as r11-6899-g7d54cccad332074d5fb81123796239f0f61b11a7 > to make sure there is no regression. > > Thanks for the bug report! > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug.
