https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98384
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[11 Regression] new test |new test case
|case |20_util/to_chars/long_doubl
|20_util/to_chars/long_doubl |e.cc in r11-6249 fails
|e.cc in r11-6249 fails on |
|powerpc64 BE |
--- Comment #33 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
After the above commit, all reported FAILs should now be addressed one way or
another so I'm removing the [11 Regression] marker.
I suppose we should keep the bug open as a reminder that the test is fragile
and could use rewriting.
