https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952

--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner <meiss...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a30a3f06b908e4e781324c2e813cd1db87119df

commit r12-97-g9a30a3f06b908e4e781324c2e813cd1db87119df
Author: Michael Meissner <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 23 18:16:03 2021 -0400

    Fix logic error in 32-bit trampolines.

    The test in the PowerPC 32-bit trampoline support is backwards.  It aborts
    if the trampoline size is greater than the expected size.  It should abort
    when the trampoline size is less than the expected size.  I fixed the test
    so the operands are reversed.  I then folded the load immediate into the
    compare instruction.

    I verified this by creating a 32-bit trampoline program and manually
    changing the size of the trampoline to be 48 instead of 40.  The program
    aborted with the larger size.  I updated this code and ran the test again
    and it passed.

    I added a test case that runs on PowerPC 32-bit Linux systems and it calls
    the __trampoline_setup function with a larger buffer size than the
    compiler uses.  The test is not run on 64-bit systems, since the function
    __trampoline_setup is not called.  I also limited the test to just Linux
    systems, in case trampolines are handled differently in other systems.

    libgcc/
    2021-04-23  Michael Meissner  <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>

            PR target/98952
            * config/rs6000/tramp.S (__trampoline_setup, elfv1 #ifdef): Fix
            trampoline size comparison in 32-bit by reversing test and
            combining load immediate with compare.
            (__trampoline_setup, elfv2 #ifdef): Fix trampoline size comparison
            in 32-bit by reversing test and combining load immediate with
            compare.

    gcc/testsuite/
    2021-04-23  Michael Meissner  <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>

            PR target/98952
            * gcc.target/powerpc/pr98952.c: New test.

Reply via email to