https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Here is one slightly more reduced testcase:typedef struct {
int g[3];
int h[3];
} i;
i j;
double k;
int l;
void w(void *);
void x(char);
void u(void *, void *);
void m() {
char a[4096], o[4096], s[4096], r[4096], t[4*4096];
w(a);
u(t, s);
char v = r[0];
double g[3];
{
int q[4096];
w(q);
w(o);
}
x(v);
l = 0;
for (; l < 3; l++) {
j.g[l] = g[l];
j.h[l] = k;
}
}
----- CUT ----
For some reason removing the typedef and just using the struct directly causes
slightly different behavior.
