https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Hmm, I didn't realize we can't push %xmm regs...  With loads+stores the
> pushes do not look less efficient for this particular example?  I suppose a
> nice
> architectural enhancement would be a push-multiple - rep pushq anyone? ;)

YMM and ZMM load/store is much more efficient.

Reply via email to