https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100731
--- Comment #6 from Harald van Dijk <harald at gigawatt dot nl> --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5) > At this point a minimal fix is prefered - in principle the file > should be a valid source to any C++ 11 capable host compiler, not > just GCC. The maintainer is on leave but we do want the build to > be fixed. Now, since the file already includes csingal/cstring and > cstdarg I'd say using the C++ wrapper to C includes and qualifying > the calls would be consistent with existing use (thus not including > stdlib.h but cstdlib). The minimal fix is the other one, to change the headers to <*.h>, as none of the calls to library functions in the file are std::-qualified. :) Alright, I'll send a patch for that once I'm able to test that the same problem is still present on master and that the same fix is sufficient to get things working.
