https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101173
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- In the light of PR101280 I am now testing the following alternate fix for the original problem, avoiding this regression: diff --git a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc index 43045c5455e..43ef112a2d0 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-loop-interchange.cc @@ -1043,8 +1043,11 @@ tree_loop_interchange::valid_data_dependences (unsigned i_idx, unsigned o_idx, continue; /* Be conservative, skip case if either direction at i_idx/o_idx - levels is not '=' (for the inner loop) or '<'. */ - if (dist_vect[i_idx] < 0 || dist_vect[o_idx] <= 0) + levels is not '=' or '<'. */ + if (dist_vect[i_idx] < 0 + || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[i_idx] > 0) + || dist_vect[o_idx] < 0 + || (DDR_REVERSED_P (ddr) && dist_vect[o_idx] > 0)) return false; } }