https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54753
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I've encountered problems related to this constraint in my WIP TS29113
testsuite, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/574115.html
This is the types/c535c-*.f90 tests.
The wording of the constraint is really confusing to me. I've parsed it to
mean that the "it" being referred to as the subject of the requirements in the
second half of the sentence is the actual argument, not the dummy argument.
c535c-1 is emitting a nonsensical diagnostic on the subroutine definition
instead of meaningful diagnostics at the invalid call sites.
c535c-2 is failing to produce diagnostics.
c535c-3 and c535c-4 are dying with internal compiler errors.
Of course it is possible that my Fortran code is buggy as well as my parsing of
the constraint. :-S
