https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51084

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2012-01-07 00:00:00         |2021-7-26

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
pure0:
  _5 = obj_2(D) < &pure[1000000];
  _6 = obj_2(D) >= &pure;
  _7 = _5 & _6;

pure1:
  _5 = obj_2(D) < &MEM <char[1000000]> [(void *)&pure + 1000000B];
  _6 = obj_2(D) >= &pure;
  _7 = _5 & _6;

pure2:
  obj.2_1 = (long unsigned int) obj_5(D);
  pure.3_2 = (long unsigned int) &pure;
  _3 = obj.2_1 - pure.3_2;
  _4 = _3 <= 1000000;

pure3:
  _1 = obj_4(D) - &pure;
  _2 = (long unsigned int) _1;
  _3 = _2 <= 1000000;

We should be able to convert pure0 and pure1 into pure3 really.

Reply via email to