https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64181

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Seems to be fixed in GCC 10+.  It looks like GCC is handling volatile more
> correctly now.

Note I could only get the original testcase to show the issue not the others
ones.

Reply via email to