https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101692
--- Comment #2 from Eugene Zhiganov <zed at lab127 dot karelia.ru> --- I've attached full source, just in case. And I think, I began to understand, what is wrong with it. In brief: it looks like GC deallocates objects, which it should not deallocate, because it does not take into account for references, which are stored in associative arrays.
