https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96416
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gcc-bugs at marehr dot
dialup.fu-b
| |erlin.de
--- Comment #19 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de ---
> I guess that's a reasonable thing to wish for, given I'm not the first
> falling for it; I hope I'll be the last :)
>
Unfortunately not, I ran into the same issue :(
But thanks to the thread, I got some insight into the question: Should every
type with an "operator->()" really be considered a pointer?
