https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69903
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This fixes the crash:
template<>
template<>
void A<B>::f<2>() {
volatile int y = 777;
};
The code is invalid there is no B::f, only A<B>::f. The problem is GCC is
finding the template and still considering it a specialization when it does not
match.
