https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65350

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Clang gets it way wrong (-1):
my operator new[](18446744073709551615)
caught unkown exception

ICC gets it right though:
std::bad_array_new_length


So I think GCC ordering is just wrong.

Reply via email to