https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102238
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|102216 |
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> This issue is blocking the patch which I have created for PR 102216 and that
> is how I found this issue so yes it is still blocking PR 102216.
I don't see what this problem has to do with pr102216 or how it's blocking your
progress on it. pr102216 is a GCC 12 regression that apparently results in a
-Warray-bounds false positive. The problem here is a false negative due to a
limitation that was introduced in GCC 10 (in r278098) with the initial
implementation of -Wrestrict for sprintf. The two have nothing in common that
I can see.
Is your fix causing an existing test to fail because it changes the IL in a way
that prevents the warning from triggering? (That shouldn't make it a blocker
as the test could be xfailed until this is fixed, but if you need me to do
something you need to explain what and why.)
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102216
[Bug 102216] [12 Regression] missed optimization causing Warray-bounds
