https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94673
gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from gcc-bugs at marehr dot dialup.fu-berlin.de --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4) > Don't we already do this with -fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=2 ? You are right, sorry! Haven't checked that again thoroughly, and it seems that you do. > -fconcepts-diagnostics-depth=2 will produce ``` <source>:18:15: error: static assertion failed 18 | static_assert(foo<int &&>); // fails with clang | ^~~~~~~~~~~ <source>:18:15: note: constraints not satisfied <source>:9:9: required by the constraints of 'template<class t> concept foo' <source>:9:15: in requirements with 't v' [with t = int&&] <source>:11:6: note: 'v' does not satisfy return-type-requirement, because 11 | {v} -> std::same_as<t &>; | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <source>:11:6: error: deduced expression type does not satisfy placeholder constraints <source>:11:6: note: constraints not satisfied In file included from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/compare:39, from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/bits/stl_pair.h:65, from /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/utility:70, from <source>:1: /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/concepts:57:15: required for the satisfaction of '__same_as<_Tp, _Up>' [with _Tp = int&&; _Up = int&] /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/concepts:62:13: required for the satisfaction of 'same_as<decltype(auto) [requires std::same_as<<placeholder>, t&>], t&>' [with decltype(auto) [requires std::same_as<<placeholder>, t&>] = int&&; t = int&&] /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-11.1.0/include/c++/11.1.0/concepts:57:32: note: the expression 'is_same_v<_Tp, _Up> [with _Tp = int&&; _Up = int&]' evaluated to 'false' 57 | concept __same_as = std::is_same_v<_Tp, _Up>; | ``` It seems that the behaviour changed again in gcc-11: ``` template <typename t> concept foo = requires(t v) { {v} -> same_as<t &>; }; static_assert(foo<int &&>); // true in gcc-10, false in gcc-11 ``` Thank you again, from my POV can be closed.