https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to sandra from comment #5)
> Jose's test case for this issue is still failing.
I find the testcase very confusing. For
type(c_other), intent(in) :: a(:)
call check_tk_as(a, t, k, e, 1_c_size_t)
it fails with:
FAIL! type (A): 6 != 255
which is printed by:
printf ("FAIL! type (A): %d != %d\n", auxp->type, type);
gfortran uses the following, which seems to be fine:
#define CFI_type_struct 6
I do not quite understand why the testcase expects 255 as type now how it tries
to generate that number.
Other fails:
FAIL! type (B): 6 != -1
FAIL! type (C): -1 != 6
FAIL! type: -1 != 6
Here the issue is that GCC uses CFI_type_struct (= 6)
while the testcase expects CFI_type_other (= -1).
I think one can argue for either.
