https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:18:46PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 10:10:32PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103418 > > > > --- Comment #6 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > > Unfortunately the patch in comment#5 does not work for me. :-( > > > > Interestingly, the Intel compiler fails on the testcase, too. > > > > Hmmm. I did have a number of other patches in my tree. I > wonder if one of those helped. Unfortunately, I updated > my git repository, where I cleared out all patch, and it > takes a long time to rebuild gcc on my laptop. > For the record, module test implicit none contains subroutine change_pointer_target(ptr) real, pointer, intent(in) :: ptr(:) call random_number(ptr) ptr(:) = ptr + 1.0 end subroutine change_pointer_target end module test program foo use test implicit none real, pointer :: a(:), b allocate(a(4), b) call random_number(b) call random_number(a) print '(5F8.5)', b, a end program foo % gfcx -o z a.f90 && ./z 0.65287 0.82614 0.77541 0.61923 0.52961
