https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104132
Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2022-02-04 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Even simpler: void f1 (void) { #pragma acc kernels { int k = -1; #pragma acc loop for (k = 0; k < 2; k++) ; if (k != -1) __builtin_abort (); } } ... does ICE in the very same way. The following fix fell out of me analyzing PR102330: --- gcc/omp-expand.cc +++ gcc/omp-expand.cc @@ -7776,7 +7776,9 @@ expand_oacc_for (struct omp_region *region, struct omp_for_data *fd) expr = build2 (plus_code, iter_type, b, fold_convert (plus_type, offset)); - expr = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, expr, false, NULL_TREE, + expr = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, expr, + DECL_P (v) && TREE_ADDRESSABLE (v), + NULL_TREE, true, GSI_SAME_STMT); ass = gimple_build_assign (v, expr); gsi_insert_before (&gsi, ass, GSI_SAME_STMT); @@ -7966,7 +7968,9 @@ expand_oacc_for (struct omp_region *region, struct omp_for_data *fd) expr = fold_build2 (TRUNC_DIV_EXPR, diff_type, expr, s); expr = fold_build2 (MULT_EXPR, diff_type, expr, s); expr = build2 (plus_code, iter_type, b, fold_convert (plus_type, expr)); - expr = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, expr, false, NULL_TREE, + expr = force_gimple_operand_gsi (&gsi, expr, + DECL_P (v) && TREE_ADDRESSABLE (v), + NULL_TREE, true, GSI_SAME_STMT); ass = gimple_build_assign (v, expr); gsi_insert_before (&gsi, ass, GSI_SAME_STMT); ... as used in a number of other similar places (when they're not using 'expand_omp_build_assign'). That change seems correct, right? (Jakub?)