https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> --- On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 08:32:25PM +0000, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104573 > > --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #3) > > I'm not sure. I don't use CLASSes, so only know a bit > > about them. If I check F18:7.5.6, I find > > > > C786 (R753) A final-subroutine-name shall be the name of a moduler > > procedure with exactly one dummy argument. That argument shall > > be nonoptional and shall be a noncoarray, nonpointer, nonallocatable, > > *** nonpolymorphic *** > > variable of the derived type being defined. All length type > > parameters of the dummy argument shall be assumed. The dummy > > argument shall not have the INTENT (OUT) or VALUE attribute. > > Steve, there's no finalization referred to in this PR. > Can you please recheck? > Ah dang. I conflated PR 104572, to which I just posted a patch, with this PR. Your patch is then likely the correct approach. Sorry about any confusion.
