https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104601

--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9251b457eb8df912f2e8203d0ee8ab300c041520

commit r12-7371-g9251b457eb8df912f2e8203d0ee8ab300c041520
Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 24 15:29:02 2022 +0100

    sccvn: Fix visit_reference_op_call value numbering of vdefs [PR104601]

    The following testcase is miscompiled, because -fipa-pure-const discovers
    that bar is const, but when sccvn during fre3 sees
      # .MEM_140 = VDEF <.MEM_96>
      *__pred$__d_43 = _50 (_49);
    where _50 value numbers to &bar, it value numbers .MEM_140 to
    vuse_ssa_val (gimple_vuse (stmt)).  For const/pure calls that return
    a SSA_NAME (or don't have lhs) that is fine, those calls don't store
    anything, but if the lhs is present and not an SSA_NAME, value numbering
    the vdef to anything but itself means that e.g. walk_non_aliased_vuses
    won't consider the call, but the call acts as a store to its lhs.
    When it is ignored, sccvn will return whatever has been stored to the
    lhs earlier.

    I've bootstrapped/regtested an earlier version of this patch, which did the
    if (!lhs && gimple_call_lhs (stmt))
      changed |= set_ssa_val_to (vdef, vdef);
    part before else if (vnresult->result_vdef), and that regressed
    +FAIL: gcc.dg/pr51879-16.c scan-tree-dump-times pre "foo \\\\(" 1
    +FAIL: gcc.dg/pr51879-16.c scan-tree-dump-times pre "foo2 \\\\(" 1
    so this updated patch uses result_vdef there as before and only otherwise
    (which I think must be the const/pure case) decides based on whether the
    lhs is non-SSA_NAME.

    2022-02-24  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

            PR tree-optimization/104601
            * tree-ssa-sccvn.cc (visit_reference_op_call): For calls with
            non-SSA_NAME lhs value number vdef to itself instead of e.g. the
            vuse value number.

            * g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C: New test.

Reply via email to