https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak <u...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4 commit r13-563-g61a6923e8917b6efcf349515a00a485dfd5b42e4 Author: Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> Date: Tue May 17 17:22:26 2022 +0200 i386: Fix ICE in final_scan_insn_1 [PR105624] Apparently const_int_operand and other const*_operand predicates do need constraints. Revert the offending patch that caused ICE. 2022-05-17 Uroš Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/105624 Revert: * config/i386/i386.md: Remove constraints when used with const_int_operand, const0_operand, const_1_operand, constm1_operand, const8_operand, const128_operand, const248_operand, const123_operand, const2367_operand, const1248_operand, const359_operand, const_4_or_8_to_11_operand, const48_operand, const_0_to_1_operand, const_0_to_3_operand, const_0_to_4_operand, const_0_to_5_operand, const_0_to_7_operand, const_0_to_15_operand, const_0_to_31_operand, const_0_to_63_operand, const_0_to_127_operand, const_0_to_255_operand, const_0_to_255_mul_8_operand, const_1_to_31_operand, const_1_to_63_operand, const_2_to_3_operand, const_4_to_5_operand, const_4_to_7_operand, const_6_to_7_operand, const_8_to_9_operand, const_8_to_11_operand, const_8_to_15_operand, const_10_to_11_operand, const_12_to_13_operand, const_12_to_15_operand, const_14_to_15_operand, const_16_to_19_operand, const_16_to_31_operand, const_20_to_23_operand, const_24_to_27_operand and const_28_to_31_operand. * config/i386/mmx.md: Ditto. * config/i386/sse.md: Ditto. * config/i386/subst.md: Ditto. * config/i386/sync.md: Ditto. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/105624 * gcc.target/i386/pr105624.c: New test.
