https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105752
Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC| |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka <ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Csaba Ráduly from comment #5)
> The fact that GCC 11 shows an error for the code in comment #4 suggests that
> this was a bug which was fixed. Does it ring a bell to anyone? This bug
> should probably marked as a duplicate, but of which other bug?
Looks like we started to correctly reject the comment #4 testcase after
r11-6800-g29853c653245c3. Since the testcase is pretty similar to the one from
PR58993, I guess we can mark this a dup of that PR.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58993 ***
