https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105915
--- Comment #5 from Benda Xu <heroxbd at sohu dot com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4) > (In reply to Benda Xu from comment #0) > > 2. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/25313 > > N.B. I'm fixing it like this instead of backporting 42eff613d0, so that pull > request might want to use the same patch: > > commit 60c84707034f025de3c8821cc5d6f27ff59143b0 (HEAD -> gcc-11) > Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> > Date: Fri Jun 10 13:01:16 2022 +0100 > > libstdc++: Partially revert r11-9772-g6f8133689f4397 [PR105915] > > The r11-9772-g6f8133689f4397 backport made two changes, but only one was > needed on the gcc-11 branch. The other should not have been backported, > and causes errors with clang. This removes the unwanted part. > > libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > > PR libstdc++/105915 > * include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h (path::begin, path::end): > Remove noexcept from declarations. > > diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > index 1cc1b3bf686..a2bc931c696 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > index 1cc1b3bf686..a2bc931c696 100644 > --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/experimental/bits/fs_path.h > @@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ namespace __detail > class iterator; > typedef iterator const_iterator; > > - iterator begin() const noexcept; > - iterator end() const noexcept; > + iterator begin() const; > + iterator end() const; > > /// @cond undocumented > // Create a basic_string by reading until a null character. > @@ -425,8 +425,8 @@ namespace __detail > class iterator; > typedef iterator const_iterator; > > - iterator begin() const noexcept; > - iterator end() const noexcept; > + iterator begin() const; > + iterator end() const; > > /// @cond undocumented > // Create a basic_string by reading until a null character. Thank you Jonathan! We have confirmed in the same environment that the patch works great.
