https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #17 from Michael_S <already5chosen at yahoo dot com> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > From what I can see, it is mostly integral implementation and we already > have one such in GCC, so the question is if we just shouldn't use it (most > of the sources > are in libgcc/soft-fp/ , then configuration files in libgcc/config/*/sfp-* > and > the simple *.c file that uses the soft-fp macros is in glibc in > sysdeps/ieee754/soft-fp/s_fsqrtl.c ). If you have good implementation, what was the reasoning behind shipping bad implementation?
