https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85620
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
ISTM that if you have to insert an endbr over indirect_return, a call should
only be eligible for sibcall if the caller is also marked with indirect_return,
otherwise the callee will indirectly return directly to an upstack caller that
may not have an endbr after the call, no?
