https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106991
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> --- > Looks like inlining decisions decide to inline new but not delete but for -Os > we inline none and elide the new/delete pair. > > Maybe we can devise some inline hints to keep pairs? Inliner is mostly built around an assumption that inline decisions are idnependent on each call site. It would be possible to add something like that though: we could add links to inline summaries to hold the pairs, modify can_inline and want_inline predicates to understand them and extend inline_call to do both inlines when needed. It will cause some fallout since users of inline_call does not expect it to modify other call sites. I am not sure how good idea this would be though. It seems to me that it makes sense to treat them independently. The reason we do not inline delete here is that delete used is different form the one defined. Function calls operator delete(void*, unsigned long) while testcase defines operator delete(void*) Honza
