https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107115
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #8) > We need a solution that works for combine too — is it possible to invent a > representation for a no-op in-place MEM "move" that only changes its alias > set? That is the same as my comment here: > I don't know what is the best way to represent an aliasing set change > even though the value didn't change on the RTL level. Clobber might work though I don't know if that is 100% correct as the value didn't change so maybe a new RTL code for this? But that would require many changes in the backend ...
