https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Eric Schmidt from comment #5) > Surely this should have been resolved as INVALID? It was marked as won't fix as I am saying we won't fix (change) the compiler to reject it (even though the code is invalid and can be rejected as we do with -flto).