https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108063

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Schmidt from comment #5)
> Surely this should have been resolved as INVALID?

It was marked as won't fix as I am saying we won't fix (change) the compiler to
reject it (even though the code is invalid and can be rejected as we do with
-flto).

Reply via email to