https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107532
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > It's tricky. I've seen unfixable problems with range-based for loops, for > instance. Shouldn't those be fixed once P2718R0 is implemented (at least for C++23)?