https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108996
--- Comment #6 from Mark Wielaard <mark at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > So, I wonder if we just shouldn't ask for a DWARF 6 extension here, have > some way for the compiler to specify DW_AT_location for the return value. There is https://dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=221105.1 "Add a mechanism for specifying subprogram return value locations"
