https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109469

--- Comment #5 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> This might be a dupe of PR108783 or PR109410 but I had to try reduce it to
> be relatively sure, so may as well file it here for completeness.

I thought it was interesting in this case that it happens even without a
definition of foo which was the main motivation for bothering here.

Reply via email to