https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109564
--- Comment #18 from Andrew Macleod <amacleod at redhat dot com> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #16) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > > Created attachment 54892 [details] > > patch I am testing > > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, the XFAILs of > gcc.dg/pr102648.c and gcc.dg/pr103359.c are not necessary. > > > This is the patch I am testing which XFAILs the four testcases. It would be > > nice to somehow recover the unexecutable edge cases and somehow distinguish > > them from UNDEFINED arguments. I'm not sure if ranger has anything to > > track that besides relying on UNDEFINED being propagated as range across > > such > > edges? btw, thanks for all the investigation/patch work. much appreciated :-)
