https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109625
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Folly should not use internal functions which is not designed for other than > libstdc++. The function wasn't designed for libstdc++, Clang had it first. But Folly shouldn't assume that non-standard extensions have a consistent/portable mangling suitable for use in APIs. In this case, it can't be mangled at all.