https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109942
Simon Pfahler <simon-pfahler at gmx dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Simon Pfahler <simon-pfahler at gmx dot de> ---
I see your point, and have realized that there is no way around explicitly
stating the return types. That was wishful thinking on my part.
Still, I feel like the behavior should be identical for any optimization level,
but this is more personal opinion and of little relevance for
standard-compliance.
Marked this issue as resolved, since even if it is a bug (as you said,
debatable), it certainly isn't a relevant one.
